Whole Force By Design: Optimising Defence to Meet Future Challenges

Professor John Gearson (Study Lead); Dr Philip Berry (Senior Researcher); Dr Joe Devanny; Dr Nina Musgrave

Whole Force sounds like an abstract term drawn from the defence dictionary. In reality, it refers to a simple and age-old idea: how can regular armed forces best be supported by industry, civilians, reserves and contractors? Our new study tries to answer this question.

This ground-breaking report is the product of a collaboration with King’s College London’s Centre for Defence Studies and extensive research and interviews with defence experts, Ministry of Defence officials and military personnel.

In 2010, the Strategic Defence and Security Review led to cuts of some non-combat military units. The question for policymakers was and remains: how can industry help fill those gaps and ensure that the UK’s armed forces remain at the cutting edge?

In the context of Coronavirus, with increased financial pressures on government and the military playing a central role in the fight against the disease, Whole Force has never been more relevant.

The study identifies what progress has been made, what obstacles remain to deliver the Whole Force model in the UK, and a list of practical recommendations designed to improve the defence community’s ability to work together.

The central conclusion of this expert-led project is clear - decisive changes are required to advance the implementation of Whole Force and any risks in embracing it are significantly outweighed by potential benefits.

This report is required reading for all those with an interest in the future of the UK’s defence capability.

The report and its recommendations was launched by a panel of experts on 13 October 2020, that included Lord Lancaster of Kimbolton TD, Lieutenant-General Sir Andrew Gregory KBE CB DL, Lieutenant-General James Swift OBE, Elisabeth Braw, and Professor John Gearson

Download the full report
How can regular armed forces best be supported by industry, civilians, reserves and contractors? Our study tries to answer this question.

Related articles

People Powered Public Services: Monitoring Australian Opinion

In our first quarterly report monitoring sentiment towards public services, we find Australians are overwhelmingly satisfied with their country's public services, but there exist disparities between the sentiments of different age groups and in the satisfaction levels of different regions with the handling of Covid-19.
14th October 2021

Competitive Tension: The Value of contestable public services in a post-pandemic world

In collaboration with Australian think tank the Menzies Research Centre, this case-study based paper argues that adding a ‘competitive edge’ to many areas of the public sector, services from public transport to healthcare can be markedly improved, productivity increased, and employment opportunities expanded.
12th October 2021

People Powered Public Services: Monitoring UK Opinion

In our first quarterly report monitoring sentiment towards public services, we find over twice as many Brits are satisfied with public services than not, but men are consistently happier than women and older generations are the most dissatisfied.
1st October 2021