Put To The Test: Commentary on government sourcing of public services for cost efficiency

Gary Sturgess, June 2010



‘Suppose the amount expended in the purchase of a given service to be a certain sum, and that an individual equally capable of rendering this service should offer to render it at less expense. Is there any good reason for refusing such an offer?’

An unassailable proposition, surely? An idea whose time has come? These words were uttered 200 years ago by the British philosopher, Jeremy Bentham, and yet there is still discomfort at the idea of market-testing public services.

The notion that competed services are more efficient than monopolies (and more responsive to their customers) has instinctive appeal. We all understand the virtues of competition over monopoly from the everyday experience of life.

And yet some folks are uncomfortable with the idea that providers might make a profit out of public services, even if they are delivered at much lower cost. Some fear that, by accident or design, the public might get less for less.

However, one of the most common sources of discomfort with market testing lies in the difficulty of knowing whether services are actually being rendered at lower cost. Since public services are (in general) not traded in the marketplace, the challenges of measurement are real.

In a recent study of contractor logistics support in the US Air Force, the North American think tank, RAND, noted that statistical analysis of the comparative efficiency of in-house and outsourced provision is difficult because the data required to standardise the diverse characteristics of different programmes does not exist.

The benefits of competition and the impact of buyer’s choice on cost-efficiency, innovation and quality from public service suppliers.

Related articles

The Structure and Future of the UK Public Services Market

The public service industry in the UK – that part of the market made up of non- government suppliers – accounts for almost 6 percent of GDP and employs some 1.2 million people. However, virtually nothing is known of the supply side of this market.
4th December 2012

Integrated Commissioning: Building a better model for the delivery of social value through diverse networks of local providers

Decentralisation has been identified as an important key to unlock more productive and responsive public services. The closer the services are to service users, the more accountable they are for addressing users’ diverse and individual needs. As such, increasing the impact of public services means devolving control and providing more choice.
30th June 2012

Frugal Innovation: Learning from social entrepreneurs in India

Over the last 60 years, innovation and improvements in India's public services have frequently emerged in the absence of state intervention or involvement. Social enterprises have stepped in to address the challenges where the government has failed.
29th February 2012