Payment By Performance: Commentary on payment mechanisms for policy outcomes

Gary Sturgess, June 2010

Introduction

 

'If policy analysts carry bumper stickers, they should read: Payment by Performance.'

The great American political scientist, Aaron Wildavsky, wrote these words almost forty years ago, and yet politicians have only recently begun to give them serious attention.

For the most part, governments pay for process and promises. Despite ambitious statements about anticipated policy outcomes and annual budget papers, daily news papers remind us that what governments buy from their agencies, most of the time, are inputs – quotas of teachers, police officers and hospital beds.

And public servants are inclined to measure how well they have complied with the rules, since due process is safer and easier to deliver than due performance.

The vast majority of public service contracts are little better – specifying inputs or at best low-level outputs, hemmed in by policy settings that make bold innovation difficult, if not unthinkable.

In recent years, this has begun to change, with the emergence of new contract models, where government pays when there is clear evidence that an outcome, or at least a high-level output directly linked to that outcome, has actually been delivered.

The attractiveness of such a model to Ministers and to Treasuries is not difficult to explain. Done well, it is not difficult to explain to the public at large. And yet the challenges are immense.

It is often difficult for public officials to state clearly in advance what the key outcomes of a particular programme are – to reduce the complexities and uncertainties of the future policy environment to a single set of performance conditions.

Download the full article
Payment by performance makes complete sense and has been part of the political rhetoric for forty years, however, it is difficult to achieve.

Related articles

People Powered Public Services: Monitoring Australian Opinion

In our first quarterly report monitoring sentiment towards public services, we find Australians are overwhelmingly satisfied with their country's public services, but there exist disparities between the sentiments of different age groups and in the satisfaction levels of different regions with the handling of Covid-19.
14th October 2021

Competitive Tension: The Value of contestable public services in a post-pandemic world

In collaboration with Australian think tank the Menzies Research Centre, this case-study based paper argues that adding a ‘competitive edge’ to many areas of the public sector, services from public transport to healthcare can be markedly improved, productivity increased, and employment opportunities expanded.
12th October 2021

People Powered Public Services: Monitoring UK Opinion

In our first quarterly report monitoring sentiment towards public services, we find over twice as many Brits are satisfied with public services than not, but men are consistently happier than women and older generations are the most dissatisfied.
1st October 2021